Americans Want A Four-Way In Their Election: Trump Vs. Sanders Vs. Clinton Vs. Some Republican
American satisfaction with their two political parties: The Democrats and the Republicans, is at the lowest level in American history.
A phenomenal number of Americans are now actively pushing for an election with non-party independent candidates than many analysts have seen in over a 100 years.
The crony kick-backs that the two old-school parties are mired in, seems irreversibly broken to most U.S. voters.
Call them Whigs and Tories, Federalists and Anti-Federalists, or most recently, Republicans and Democrats; however they’re divided, two parties have generally dominated the electoral system of the United States. That’s not to say that there cannot be more than two, as there most certainly have been and are. But parties existing outside of the prevailing monolithic dichotomy tend to be so hopelessly overmatched, their efforts ultimately so ineffective, that they are typically herded together under a single label. We call them, all of them, “third parties”.
The alternative, of course, is to be without affiliation, to accept no label other than the liberating moniker “Independent”. While traditionally unsuccessful, arguably even spectacularly so, those identifying as Independents have without question at least one great winning champion to whom they can appeal to lend themselves relevance and credibility: The nation’s first President, George Washington.
Not only did Washington refuse to align himself with any political party, he was an enemy of the very notion, believing that it would give rise to partisanship and division in the federal government that would hurt its ability to effectively manage the nation’s affairs. He held to this view throughout his administration, and delivered a scathing indictment of parties in politics during his farewell address.
As a rule, the United States of America has chosen not to follow its father’s advice. Today, only Republicans and Democrats are taken seriously as contenders for the presidency; third party nominees are at best parasitic ticks drawing off useful votes and at worst utter comedy, while Independent candidates barely register at all. Washington would roll over in his grave: The two-party system runs the show.
Nevertheless, Independents can have a major impact on American politics. Many minor candidates who run for President, be they third party or no party, do so with the full knowledge and understanding that their chances of actual victory and ascension to the White House are virtually nonexistent. Instead of hoping to win, they are there to champion their causes, and most crucially, to provide the people with an opportunity to cast “message votes” that warn their usual party – Republican or Democrat – that they’ve strayed from their principles and had best clean up their act in the future. And of course, Independent candidates can, and do, win election to congress on at least some occasions.
All of which is aside from the fundamental fact that the United States, in theory at least, is a republic of open debate and exchange of ideas. The electoral system turns on two parties, but no political contender has to identify with either one. All are free to choose their own party – or, if they wish, to choose none at all. See more at: http://2016.independent-candidate.org/